Supra swap

the rear lights something different

Looks deformed on the driver side, also look near the middle of the trunk area, gap that leans towards the driver side also, looks ight but bad job.

P.s. I can find so many faults but I don't wanna keep typing about it. >>

Just had to throw this in from the side, lol.

Question: what is the best rice-burning car?
toyota - (45%)
honda - (20%)
acura - (5%)
mitsubishi - (12%)
subaru - (4%)
suzuki - (1%)
lexus - (3%)
infiniti - (1%)
mazda - (6%)
Total Votes: 198

This post has been edited by Meonspeed: Sep 30, 2004 - 11:39 PM

that's a dissgrace to a celica

oreo's tail conversion looks 10 times better... that car is kinda sad... be A for effort

seeing that made me remember to update my car-domain page >>

Especially since the left tail is lower than the right.

looks liek it is at an angle

He would of been better off with these...

http://www.quadconversions.com/Celica/celi...urner_forum.htm

-K12UDE+Oct 4, 2004 - 1:34 PM

i like the afterburner look. Its much cheaper than doing an entire Supra Tail Light conversion and it gets rid of the stock tail lights. >>

The only thing that would make a supra tail light conv. look good is if you swaped bumpers too, the celica one is short (there is way to much spaceunder the trunklib for it) where as the supra one is not so it makes the skinny tails look better

yeah, thats not very good, it just looks rong.

I like the afterburner ones too. there not the best but better then stock.

How can toyota be a good rice burner, there are nowhere near as menay cheep bs parts for them as most the others on the list.

This post has been edited by creis: Oct 4, 2004 - 11:57 PM