>
QUOTE(presure2 @ Jul 24, 2006 - 2:59 PM) [snapback]460337[/snapback]
>
>
QUOTE
>good job skirting the issue.
john, im not "skirting" the issue at all.
my point by saying that was to not bring up all the bull with burn again.
ive warned him pleanty of times before about the crap.
the post was a "taste of your own medicine" sort of thing, again not that i have to explain myself to you.
how is dodging any sort of defense a taste of my own medicine? bc you don't have to answer to me? i think the medicine i offered was more of a: "this is what's wrong, and here's proof".
i don't care if you do answer or not. your lack of effort proves that you don't care what people think of you, or why you take certain actions. also, based on mine and others' opinions, the lack of a response represents a lack of any justifiable reason. that is, by traditional standards, rather shady, and not very productive. there is a general concern over things, and you are tucking your tail.
you don't have to answer that, obviously. as you don't need to. you don't have to burn me, to offer a defense. that's what a debate is. i offered all the information very maturely, and it was merely a chance for someone to explain things to the people concerned.
remember, these are not my direct thoughts, though i agree with them, I DO NOT CARE IF ACTION IS TAKEN. i'm just offering up everything into a structured point, and pointing out the items in question.
again manny, i dont' care if you tell why or not, the only thing that matters is what coomer thinks of the structured representation i put forth.
he'll either read it, and do nothing. or he'll read it, and take action. EITHER IS FINE WITH ME. forgive me for offering everything up in a structure where it actually makes sense, and makes you think about even considering to offer up a defense. i am truely sorry.
-John-