>
QUOTE(Kwanza26 @ Nov 10, 2006 - 1:27 AM) [snapback]501219[/snapback]
>
>
QUOTE(Bigmeanbulldog55 @ Nov 9, 2006 - 12:59 AM) [snapback]500774[/snapback]
>
That is the traditional view. But due to what I've seen lately, I question it. There is no doubt that FWD is easier to control. And my experiance with mud trucks says that if you loose your front, you are screwed, but if you loose your rear you have a chance. I think it's not that FWD is worse than RWD in the snow, it's just that RWD isn't as bad as it's made out to be. But, it just takes more skill to use. I don't know, I'll have to test several cars in the snow with RWD, FWD, and AWD to actually know.
Since I've already 'tested'... it's true what has been posted. AWD>FF>FR>MR/RR... but if you're not an idiot... none of them are that bad...
What about the old beatles? They did great in the snow and they are RR. The Porshe Boxter is said to do well. AWD would definately be best. How much of a rear difference would there be in general across the FF - FR cars, if set up right. I think that is key. If it's a boat, obviously, it won't do as well in the snow. But if it's light and doesn't have loads of torque, would it really be that bad? The only thing FR I've driving in the snow was a Wrangler. It wasn't bad, but being so short, when it spun it would spin all the way around and fast. After you got the hang of it, it wasn't bad though, just had to expect it to do that.