yes i'm laughing at you, rofl rofl
wut can a stock 3s swap hang with??? - 6G Celicas Forums
>
a stage2 should hold the power just fine. yours probably died early from either an incorrect install, or the fact that you probably didnt take the time to break it in correctly.
QUOTE(easternpiro1 @ Jan 21, 2007 - 3:20 AM) [snapback]519656[/snapback]
>
>
Take his word for it....i found out THE HARD WAY that a stage 2 wont hold up.....
i soon have to replace the one i JUST GOT because i didnt know i was running 265hp @ the wheels... 
>
QUOTE(playr158 @ Jan 20, 2007 - 7:07 PM) [snapback]519557[/snapback]
>
>
your getting yourself into a WHOLE world of variables and you CANNOT speculate on the kind of performance and times it can do...and lol at the idea of using a stage 2 clutch on that kind of motor
>
QUOTE(6G94celica @ Jan 20, 2007 - 6:44 PM) [snapback]519552[/snapback]
>
So how about a 2nd gen with FMIC, forged pistons, balanced crank, port and polished, rods, valves, springs, cams, and a greddy turbo also the norm 3" DP and exhaust and a new manifold and bored out to a 2.2. what do yoiu guys think thatll be runin at for hp and wut you think thats gonna hang with. guesses on 1/4 times. i got my speculations but wanna see what you guys think. ohh and light weight flywheel and stage 2 clutch mabye stage 3
So how about a 2nd gen with FMIC, forged pistons, balanced crank, port and polished, rods, valves, springs, cams, and a greddy turbo also the norm 3" DP and exhaust and a new manifold and bored out to a 2.2. what do yoiu guys think thatll be runin at for hp and wut you think thats gonna hang with. guesses on 1/4 times. i got my speculations but wanna see what you guys think. ohh and light weight flywheel and stage 2 clutch mabye stage 3
your getting yourself into a WHOLE world of variables and you CANNOT speculate on the kind of performance and times it can do...and lol at the idea of using a stage 2 clutch on that kind of motor
Take his word for it....i found out THE HARD WAY that a stage 2 wont hold up.....
i soon have to replace the one i JUST GOT because i didnt know i was running 265hp @ the wheels... a stage2 should hold the power just fine. yours probably died early from either an incorrect install, or the fact that you probably didnt take the time to break it in correctly.
15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
that may also be VERY true 
^^ and i figured dan would be laughing his ass off...
but same thing happened to the clutch i had before that doc installed may need more beef according to the guy there b/c the torque rating was so close the actual torque numbers...
^^ and i figured dan would be laughing his ass off...but same thing happened to the clutch i had before that doc installed may need more beef according to the guy there b/c the torque rating was so close the actual torque numbers...
QUOTE (Galcobar @ Oct 15, 2008 - 2:44 AM)You want power but have no money. That's a problem.Cheap. Reliable. Fast. Pick two.
>
i seriously doubt that.
ive been running my ACT street disk and heavy duty PP (rated for 250 ft. lbs.) for a yr and a half, most of that time over the limit of the clutch, or right @ it, with no issues.
IMO 99% of the premature clutch failures you see are from either bad install, or bad break in.
QUOTE(easternpiro1 @ Jan 21, 2007 - 4:09 AM) [snapback]519665[/snapback]
>
that may also be VERY true ^^ and i figured dan would be laughing his ass off...
but same thing happened to the clutch i had before that doc installed may need more beef according to the guy there b/c the torque rating was so close the actual torque numbers...
that may also be VERY true
^^ and i figured dan would be laughing his ass off...but same thing happened to the clutch i had before that doc installed may need more beef according to the guy there b/c the torque rating was so close the actual torque numbers...
i seriously doubt that.
ive been running my ACT street disk and heavy duty PP (rated for 250 ft. lbs.) for a yr and a half, most of that time over the limit of the clutch, or right @ it, with no issues.
IMO 99% of the premature clutch failures you see are from either bad install, or bad break in.
Former Team 5SFTE pro member ;)13.6@108MPH, 5SFTE Powered
>
youre probably right, probably didnt break the 2nd one in right. the guy suggested i go with a jdm clutch, starts with an x. forgot what he called it.
QUOTE(presure2 @ Jan 21, 2007 - 6:47 AM) [snapback]519677[/snapback]
>
>
i seriously doubt that.
ive been running my ACT street disk and heavy duty PP (rated for 250 ft. lbs.) for a yr and a half, most of that time over the limit of the clutch, or right @ it, with no issues.
IMO 99% of the premature clutch failures you see are from either bad install, or bad break in.
>
QUOTE(easternpiro1 @ Jan 21, 2007 - 4:09 AM) [snapback]519665[/snapback]
>
that may also be VERY true ^^ and i figured dan would be laughing his ass off...
but same thing happened to the clutch i had before that doc installed may need more beef according to the guy there b/c the torque rating was so close the actual torque numbers...
that may also be VERY true
^^ and i figured dan would be laughing his ass off...but same thing happened to the clutch i had before that doc installed may need more beef according to the guy there b/c the torque rating was so close the actual torque numbers...
i seriously doubt that.
ive been running my ACT street disk and heavy duty PP (rated for 250 ft. lbs.) for a yr and a half, most of that time over the limit of the clutch, or right @ it, with no issues.
IMO 99% of the premature clutch failures you see are from either bad install, or bad break in.
youre probably right, probably didnt break the 2nd one in right. the guy suggested i go with a jdm clutch, starts with an x. forgot what he called it.
QUOTE (Galcobar @ Oct 15, 2008 - 2:44 AM)You want power but have no money. That's a problem.Cheap. Reliable. Fast. Pick two.
xact?
>
yeah i think that was it
QUOTE(playr158 @ Jan 22, 2007 - 6:39 PM) [snapback]520196[/snapback]
>
xact?
xact?
yeah i think that was it
QUOTE (Galcobar @ Oct 15, 2008 - 2:44 AM)You want power but have no money. That's a problem.Cheap. Reliable. Fast. Pick two.
or exedy? 
expensive clutches.
expensive clutches.
-Alex {](O_o)[}1993.5 Toyota Supra....with stuff........sorta broken....1998 Toyota Celica....this one, too, has stuff........broken....yeah...definitely broken....
exedy = start with E
xact = start with X
jus givin a hard time
xact = start with X
jus givin a hard time
>
only if you spell it out.
QUOTE(playr158 @ Jan 23, 2007 - 8:59 AM) [snapback]520374[/snapback]
>
exedy = start with E
xact = start with X
jus givin a hard time
exedy = start with E
xact = start with X
jus givin a hard time
only if you spell it out.
-Alex {](O_o)[}1993.5 Toyota Supra....with stuff........sorta broken....1998 Toyota Celica....this one, too, has stuff........broken....yeah...definitely broken....
XTD? ebay brand
Visit My Automotive & Tech Blog.
Any 2nd gen could beat a SRT4 But someone needs to have some mods done to beat a STi because those things are wicked fast. Trust me, I have a friend that owns one.
>
hm...those srt4 are very quick...i've seen some at the track and boy they can really go!...
QUOTE(95CelicaRacer @ Jan 29, 2007 - 8:53 AM) [snapback]522235[/snapback]
>
Any 2nd gen could beat a SRT4 But someone needs to have some mods done to beat a STi because those things are wicked fast. Trust me, I have a friend that owns one.
Any 2nd gen could beat a SRT4 But someone needs to have some mods done to beat a STi because those things are wicked fast. Trust me, I have a friend that owns one.
hm...those srt4 are very quick...i've seen some at the track and boy they can really go!...
>
Nope, he's got a ST185 RC engine in his ST.
QUOTE(HaRv3sTeR @ Jan 19, 2007 - 6:02 PM) [snapback]519347[/snapback]
>
>
wasnt it a 3rd gen?
>
QUOTE(playr158 @ Jan 19, 2007 - 6:55 PM) [snapback]519291[/snapback]
>
jeff ran a 13.9 last year @ 12 or 13psi on an RC185 motor (2nd gen)
and just off topic note...my jetta 1.8t runs 14.3
jeff ran a 13.9 last year @ 12 or 13psi on an RC185 motor (2nd gen)
and just off topic note...my jetta 1.8t runs 14.3
wasnt it a 3rd gen?
Nope, he's got a ST185 RC engine in his ST.
The reason a 2nd gen celica can beat an srt-4 is because of their all wheel drive. Don't get me wrong, Neons are quick, but their fwd just doesn't cut it on takeoff. 
my list of cars ive out ran or hung with from a 30mph roll on the freeway.
stock sti
moded wrx wagon
moded gti
g35
z350
z28
mustang v8
3.5 camry
supercharged frontier
stock sti
moded wrx wagon
moded gti
g35
z350
z28
mustang v8
3.5 camry
supercharged frontier
>
but when u swap the 2nd gen 3s into a 6th gen(non gt4), then its 2 wheel drive.
so the 2wheel drive 6th gen with 2nd gen 3s can beat an srt4 (?) ......both 2 wheel drive
QUOTE(95CelicaRacer @ Feb 13, 2007 - 12:13 PM) [snapback]526447[/snapback]
>
The reason a 2nd gen celica can beat an srt-4 is because of their all wheel drive. Don't get me wrong, Neons are quick, but their fwd just doesn't cut it on takeoff.
The reason a 2nd gen celica can beat an srt-4 is because of their all wheel drive. Don't get me wrong, Neons are quick, but their fwd just doesn't cut it on takeoff.
but when u swap the 2nd gen 3s into a 6th gen(non gt4), then its 2 wheel drive.
so the 2wheel drive 6th gen with 2nd gen 3s can beat an srt4 (?) ......both 2 wheel drive
aha i hear ya markie , i got a 7afe... i think the metro would be a good run
How far can it take you. The real question is. How far are you willing to go ?