Whats your point?

basically that the two philosophies come from the same beginnings ever wonder why you adorn that silly hat and robe during the graduation ceremony? educate yourself on the origins of academia


so in summary

1. both science and theology are issues of debate because the facts each utilize are qualifications of numerous similar observations
2. these observations both try and explain phenomena , to a certain degree, and different aspects of the occurrence
3.Both science and religion are faith based ever taken quantum physics? (interpretation and controversy)
granted quantum mechanics is at the forefront of science theory but it displays the often overlooked metaphysical undertones in science
4. neither of the philosophies rely on blind faith.. they both have method in the madness based upon the presumptions of defined facts
5. whether science minded or religiously driven the point has always been to come up with answers, many times the conflict only lies in the motivation for the question when the answers differ. Do psychologists and sociologists have arguments over human motivational factors sure. Both however can be right even when their POV's are night and day from each other.
6. The chronic issue flares when one side or the other declares a irrefutable stance in their method.. this happens in every philosophy but those who do it are pushed to the way side by their peers for a lack of intellectual honesty .... you cannot know everything with out omnipotence
7. Lastly to set an example..because everyone wants to know and when we think we know we wanna be right about it... faux pompous
intellectuals will through fact after fact in the face of someone who disagrees to prove what? that they are right? unfortunately thats not the case... whether on one side or the other of a debate critically minded individuals should see the relevance of both arguments...

intellect is not a devise to subjugate but should be used to educate people... then allow them to make their own interpretation. Those who throw around intellectual clout generally are only trying to fulfill some egocentric deficiency in their view of themselves. rationally keep this in mind when the urge to rant on theories laws and even misconceptions

oh and you wanna know what life is all about?

>

I hate to point this out seeing as I'm usually pretty passive, but before you expcet everyone to read the dictionary for 45 minutes to grasp what you just said, mabey you should learn a lesson from yourself... You make a great point, imo, but seemingly only to those who are already on "that" level

>

yeah man i dig what your sayin.. and thats why i feel that way because i'll catch myself doing it too.. but its bad.. and i didnt really expect anyone to go through all that only meant to catch the attention of those on the up with argumentative composition and at the same time give others some intellectual ammo of their own while still makin my point..

You wrote all that so you could try to put theology in the same playing field as science?

*sigh no.....