My2Celi

#1

Original source..
http://www.celica-web.net/gallery_celica/st202/0734.jpg


What makes this tail light look a bit different from the original besides the amber removal?

This post has been edited by My2Celi: Sep 4, 2007 - 12:09 AM

---

<--- I miss :'' (

coldbluesteel

#2

The round lamps.

I like it.

malpaso

#3

cover of tails is completely removed... Reversing lights has no red frame in the picture.

---

No more replicas... This is evolution... This isSS-four:)________[Featured Celica of 6gc.net @ 2010]_________

azian_advanced

#4

what do you think of these?

---

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mangozac

#5

Love the first one. Not so keen on the second pic tho :\

fanboy95

#6

i like the first 1 the best.

mneal2_92788

#7

i think they look good, the first one that is...
off topic but does that wing look p/s to anyone else?

and are those the same car? they are exactly the same, except the tails

This post has been edited by mneal2_92788: Sep 4, 2007 - 8:06 AM

TRDcelica96

#8

the first pic looks cool but this isnt real its photo shop... it is the same car and look how funny the color of the 3ed break light looks in both pics

---

Shot at 2007-07-01myspace.com/jeremiahisadick

Akira_g4

#9

Damn look at that wing! its taller than the car itself

This post has been edited by Akira_g4: Sep 4, 2007 - 10:36 AM

---

- 180k and still running strong"Yes...yes I do have a myspace..."

97celicaguy

#10

i really like the first one where do they sell those

manphibian

#11

Nowhere, they're photoshopped. as said above.

---

-LukeMy Flickr

My2Celi

#12

photoshop? motha $%#^. I really like how it looks, kinda makes it look more modern imo.

---

<--- I miss :'' (