http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj8-fBC6XHk






P.S "I hope is not repost it!"

This post has been edited by dtlwrc: Oct 29, 2007 - 5:19 PM

yea its a repost..i posted it a few months ago...its a cool video though. I love how only thing thats faster is the supra.

>

Ok sorry for that! I enjoy the exact some thing in this video, only supra....!

cool vid

>


x2!

Im intrested why didnt they let the STi / EVO / or a normal Cossword (not the one with the Small turbo) to race with the GT-Four? Maybe cuz it would be a total kill by them?

Im not even impressed that Silvia / Escort / RX7 was killed... But EVo /STi or a Cossie with the 400nm - its another story...

But anyway - cool vid.

>

top gear did a cosworth vs gt4 comparison .

>

^ Yes i have seen that episode and here is the url:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKYK4yefz1E

>

The one they droped agains GT-Four in this video, and in the Video where they compare GT-Four to Cosworth is a version with Max power: 220 Bhp @ 6250 rpm (227 Bhp @5750 after 1994), 290 N/m @ 3500rpm (@2500rpm after 1994), if they comapred GT-Four to the 1992 first relise Cosworth - iut would be another story 400 Nm came stock on these bad boys...

I Still think that the Impreza's and Evo's of THAT time would be less or equal to the Celica GT4. Of course a 2005 WRX STI would whoop a ST205 all day.

But both the Impreza and Evo didn't have that much power out of there consumer cars as the Toyota.

This post has been edited by Kadett: Oct 31, 2007 - 4:34 PM

>

I drove BOTH (either EVO 4 or STi Ver 4 / 5) not even comparible cars to the GT-Four. STi has way more Power, JDM version came with the 280hp and 340Nm stock, and its lighter (if we take a RA version), Evo - is another story - it would be still questionable who would win - but i would bet on EVo...

IMHO - GT-Four is way to heavy for the power that it has...

>


i think the real problem is that the ct20b is not as powerful of a turbo as what you get stock on the evo or sti. upgrade the turbo and the car will feel a lot lighter.

>

Might be... Never drove a Swaped celica - but i compare GT4 to a SSIII - SSIII does feel more quicker reacting car, and you can feel the road more in it, same thing in a STi - its just feels like you and a Car is one piece. I Couldnt find this feeling in a GT-four (even that i drove 5 diferent ones / modded and stock), this is the main reason im all over agains the GT-Four - its just not the right car FOR ME, and i give all of my voices to a N/A celica or if i would go Turbo - i would chose the STi (even if its a car without the face). And this might not be cuz of the Turbo, its cuz of overall setup of the car / weight transfering / weight of the car...

GT-Four is GT-Four - car with its own personality...

Just a simple comparison that me and my friend did:

From rolling start SSIII and a GTfour (i was driving GT-Four, a friend of mine - my SSIII witch wasnt so stock but anyway):

2 gear / SSIII was at 4K rpms, GT4 on 3K rpms - Not even single chance to overtake SSIII till the end of 3 gear...

From Standing start - GT4 goes in front by 1 car lenght - and stays like this all the 400meter...

I saw this my self - and i could not belive it - cuz driving SSIII doesnt feels like it has this kind of power to keep up with the GT4....

you would love a swapped celica.
it would run circles around a stock gt4 or sti.

i was dead even with my friends 300hp340tq sti (far from stock) on the highway. with a ct20b, i would have beaten him without a problem.