>
QUOTE(DEATH @ Apr 11, 2008 - 10:50 AM) [snapback]663572[/snapback]
>
>
QUOTE(6G96GT @ Apr 10, 2008 - 7:07 PM) [snapback]663396[/snapback]
>
>
QUOTE(presure2 @ Apr 10, 2008 - 5:55 PM) [snapback]663368[/snapback]
>
i would go 10.5:1 max, using 93 octane, minimum.
10.5:1 - is that your max "safe" point? I want the max, but in the "safe" zone. What's after 93 octane? Racing Fuel?
Thanks!
Yeah but you should be fine if your tuned right and
only ever use 93. That combination will make a big improvement in power too, especially if you do the cam upgrade and all the other little things you've been talking about. Do it - build an N/A monster man

its been done.
research the name "jim snoodgrass"
he made ~147whp, with engine management and all, shaved head, valve job, and one cam (exhaust IIRC)
i would expect ~5-10whp more with the newer electronics, and newer motor. (his was a mr2 "5th gen celica equivlent" motor)