Over 1M Posts • 84K Topics • 9K Authors

Eric Hsu is a MORON. - 6G Celicas Forums

Topic #91358 34 posts Started by easternpiro1
>
QUOTE (playr158 @ Dec 26, 2013 - 1:02 PM) *
>I'm going to disagree with your belt vs chain arguement, as chain is better for higher RPMS, more durable and less maintenance....sooo if you're going to drift a chain is safer than a belt. Chains are less likely to jump teeth, shred parts and are more rugid. Belts are rip/tear/shred and require replacing.

3s is expensive for a reason......cause nobody keeps them around except a select few. not because its the ****; no supply cause no demand.
Not to mention they only came in 2 cars......from the 1990s (or earlier) in the US.

Cast iron is stronger can also be argued as the 3s has a tendancy to crack blocks and run a cylinder lean. A sleeved aluminum block that is properly tuned is just as good if not better....Tell me when you last saw a cast iron block in a supercar?


saying better with no real information is weaksauce


I'd rather brake the belt drifting on a non-interference engine than a chain any day. You'd have to scrap the chain driven engine and start over.
The cylinder lean situation can be cured through proper tuning. IIRC cylinder 2 and 3 tend to run more lean due to the fact that they sit right under the throttle body. The cracked block issue can happen for several reasons as well. Primarily running too much power over 500 if my memory serves me well, but this can also be caused by poor tune, bad gas, a bad build or too much boost. I'm sure the same scenario can exist in the SR platform as well. Either way...I think the guy from Eric Hsu's comment should go for it, and see how well it does!
>
QUOTE (easternpiro1 @ Dec 24, 2013 - 8:49 AM) *
>>
QUOTE (sentraman @ Dec 13, 2013 - 7:47 PM) *
>>
QUOTE (easternpiro1 @ Dec 10, 2013 - 7:54 PM) *
>^^^Thats the angle my pal took saying that Eric was saying its not worth it to swap in a 240 when there are better options, but to me, he went WAY too far comparing the two. In all reality the SR20 is a piece of crap compared to the 3s. I see people having WAY more problems with the SR than a 3s. And as far as racing I so happned to race an sr20 swapped sentra that was slightly modded, and it ended VERY badly for him. they dont hold a candle to the 3s



So was this sentra a DET swapped SR or a n/a bolt on?

Being an owner of both 3SGTE and SR20DET/VE/VET, I wouldn't say one is more reliable that the other. Clearly this is a bias forum, but from my perspective Eric is correct.





It was a Sentra DET swapped with minor upgrades. so you think Eric is correct in general that the SR is a better motor? or his perspective on platform?



It's hard to compare, simply cause ALL of my SR20's from DE to VE have all been very reliable. Same with all of my 3S as well. Right now it's even harder to compare simply cause my car is a stock block SR20VE, which is a far more superior motor than a DET or a 3SGTE
>
QUOTE (sentraman @ Jan 17, 2014 - 3:24 PM) *
>stock block SR20VE, which is a far more superior motor than a 3SGTE


Can you explain this one for me? Cause what information I look at online seems to be lacking numbers in comparison to the 3sgte, unless you are speaking of the VET version, which still appears to be short of the stock 3rd Gen 3sgte we all commonly love.
Hey, can I get one of those SR20's? It just sounds so awesome. Eric says Yes! I'm gonna do it. biggrin.gif

What a jerk. It's like asking your mom if you can go play on the street. Screw Eric, (who I don't know personally, Im sure is a nice guy, and therefore don't mean any actual offence to) but carve your own path.